Topic: Do you prefer 1969 or 1970 Mach1 and why? (Read 5103 times)

Mach1EH · « **on:** July 29, 2009, 06:08:45 AM »

If you were to choose between a 1969 or 1970 Mach1 which would you choose and why?

Personally I like the 1969 Mach1 for a few reasons.
* 1st year the Mach1 was produced
*like the front lights
*was the year I was born
*would sit nicely beside my 'new' 2003 Mach1; as 03 is the 1st year the Mach1 was brought back.

Just curious to your choice and why.

Thanks!

Soaring · « **Reply #1 on:** July 29, 2009, 07:30:04 AM »

I also prefer the 69 over the 70 for body style reasons alone. In addition, the engines started to become weak assed 8:1 compression ratio starting with the 70's because of the gas crunch back then. I know what it was like having to sit in line at the gas station back then. I also prefer the dash layout of the 69 and the back window as compared to the 70.

Thierry · « **Reply #2 on:** July 29, 2009, 01:05:09 PM »

My favorite is also the 69 because of its design. I love the shark-like front fascia the 69 had and although the 70 looks almost the same, with the "eyes" in the "mouth", it wasn't the same.

kramerj2 · « **Reply #3 on:** August 06, 2009, 04:32:00 PM »

I have to go with the 69 as well. The dual headlights along with the nonfunctional rear quarter scoops gives it a more agressive look. Of course I'm biased as I have a 69 Mach 428CJ.

Mach1EH · « **Reply #4 on:** August 06, 2009, 08:07:38 PM »

Quote from: kramerj2 on August 06, 2009, 04:32:00 PM

I have to go with the 69 as well. The dual headlights along with the nonfunctional rear quarter scoops gives it a more agressive look. Of course I'm biased as I have a 69 Mach 428CJ.

Purdy.
Care to share any pictures??
I'd be happy with an M-code 4 V but a S-Code or higher would be great!

Ever take that beast to the Woodward ave dream cruise??

Been a few years since I have been there myself

69fast · « **Reply #5 on:** August 06, 2009, 11:21:33 PM »

hello there fellow canadian, 69 is the way to go

kramerj2 · « **Reply #6 on:** August 07, 2009, 04:23:02 AM »

Never been to Woodward but then the car has only been on the road for a year. I'm still working some of the bugs out of it. It's been plaging me with all sorts of little mechanical problems. But then I suppose that is to be expected when you rebuild a car.

Mach1EH · « **Reply #7 on:** August 07, 2009, 05:49:29 AM »

Quote from: kramerj2 on August 07, 2009, 04:23:02 AM

Never been to Woodward but then the car has only been on the road for a year. I'm still working some of the bugs out of it. It's been plaging me with all sorts of little mechanical problems. But then I suppose that is to be expected when you rebuild a car.

Nice; good on you for keeping another classic alive and not crunched!

Mach1EH · « **Reply #8 on:** August 07, 2009, 05:49:48 AM »

Quote from: 69fast on August 06, 2009, 11:21:33 PM

hello there fellow canadian, 69 is the way to go

EH, how goes?

FASTBACK65GT · « **Reply #9 on:** August 07, 2009, 11:08:32 AM »

I prefer the '69 MACH 1 over the '70 Mach 1, BUT, I prefer the '70 Boss 302 over the '69 302.
I think the '70 Boss 302 is one of the best looking cars ever, and is in my top 10 list. But the '69 Mach 1 Mustang isn't on the list. The '69 Mach 1 is somewhat a "pretty" car with all its fancy striping, chrome trim, etc. and I don't care for the big heavy rocker panel on the '70 Mach 1's at all. Both are nice looking cars, but not may favorites.

I think the '70 Mustang was designed for the Boss 302 and Ford designers added the big heavy rocker panels on the '70 Mach 1 making it look "heavy". The odd-shaped factory wheels (not Mag500's) also added to the "heavy" look. The '69 Mach 1 is complete and refined in its striping, trim and other details. Nothing too overdone.

My 2 cents.

69fast · « **Reply #10 on:** August 07, 2009, 09:43:43 PM »

its goin , u ever heard of peter gibbons the racecar driver?

mach1cody · « **Reply #11 on:** September 07, 2009, 06:39:43 PM »

I like the 70 more than the 69 because there was a lot less made and I will take the 351c over the 351w all day,If your not going big block.And the 70 351c 4v still had 11and 1/2 to one pistons stock,but i like the striping on the 69 better.

Tim175 · « **Reply #12 on:** September 08, 2009, 04:16:14 PM »

I prefer the 70 over the 69, i dont know why just always has been that way for some reason, i guess it just looks more aggressive.

calypso coral · « **Reply #13 on:** September 25, 2009, 03:29:00 PM »

I like the 70 better. Never liked the 69 4 round lights up front. Don't like the concave rear taillight panel on 69 either. LOVE the 70 mach and how it was done.

Always liked the 69 quarter scoop. There are some pre production Ford photos of the 70 mach 1 that have that scoop, as well as 429 in the tape stripe instead of 428!

that70scjshow · « **Reply #14 on:** October 17, 2009, 11:19:55 PM »

I refer the 69, always liked the front end, but I own a 70 mach 1.

Ibadasgt-500 · « **Reply #15 on:** November 11, 2009, 04:50:41 PM »

[ Guests cannot view attachments ] I always was fond of the 69 style. Now If I had my choice It would have to be a 69 428scj GT like this. This one belongs to my mother. LOL She is in her sixties and drives it like she stole it. Shes still pretty darn good with a 4 speed

Mach1EH · « **Reply #16 on:** November 11, 2009, 06:26:09 PM »

Quote from: Ibadasgt-500 on November 11, 2009, 04:50:41 PM

(Attachment Link) I always was fond of the 69 style. Now If I had my choice It would have to be a 69 428scj GT like this. This one belongs to my mother. LOL She is in her sixties and drives it like she stole it. Shes still pretty darn good with a 4 speed

That is one very cool mother! ppsssttt - she interested in adopting??

Ibadasgt-500 · « **Reply #17 on:** November 11, 2009, 06:32:14 PM »

LOL I don't know. She said one was enough!!!!!! It sucked being an only child

Tim175 · « **Reply #18 on:** November 20, 2009, 05:00:03 PM »

I love the 69 and the 70 both but i would prefer a 70 i think. But hell i would take either with no hesitations

Col · « **Reply #19 on:** November 21, 2009, 04:50:23 AM »

Hi from Oz..I prefer `69 Mach. It has balls and looks mean standing still. The `70 isnt as aggressive looking but both are great looking muscle cars. Like their styling better than my `73 Mach...Don't see many over here (Newcastle, N.S.W. Australia)..Funny though when I bought mne it was for sale only 2 kilometres away! Meant to be!!!

Author Topic: Do you prefer 1969 or 1970 Mach1 and why? (Read 5103 times)