V8 Ford Mustang forums
August 30, 2008, 04:37:58 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Register today to participate in our forum, live chat, arcade games, create a free blog and much more.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register Contact  
292.jpg 53.jpg 141.jpg 64.jpg 92.jpg 2.jpg
Poll
Question: What is the best motor built by ford
4.6
289
302
351
429

Pages: 1
  Print  
Author Topic: Best Motor  (Read 1276 times)
Russ
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 362



View Profile WWW
« on: May 31, 2008, 09:27:50 AM »

Don't get caught up in the boss or HP, just over all choice. STANG OUT
66GTKFB
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 174


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2008, 10:35:57 AM »

That's not a fair question. The 289, 302 and 351W are basically the same engine. They evolved from a 221 with a 260 in between. There are some differences as in 5 bolt and 6 bolt to the transmission in the 289, but that is part of the evolution process. The 4.6 L is a modern block that evolved into a 5.4 L. I got a 5.4 L in my van and I like it, and it makes a great Mustang engine. As to an engine series, there are several to consider, the FE blocks, the light weight cast iron blocks, the new overhead cam engines, etc. The key is what the engine was designed to do, modified to do, how it evolved and ultimately, it's reliability.
Jim 
Russ
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 362



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2008, 01:14:17 PM »

Yeah I know but there are people that jsut liek a certain motor. Like I like the 351C but I have always been a fan of the 302. Please don't read to much into it,lol. If anyone wants me to add a motor let me know and I will, these are just the ones that stick out too me. STANG OUT
Soaring
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 905
Mustang: 1965 coupe, and 2003 Mach1
Daily driver: 1965 Mustang coupe
Location: Wimberley, Texas
Beer?:


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2008, 08:59:44 PM »

The 289 and the 302 are the same engine.  They are not muscle car engines, but pony car engines.   The 351 series engines started the muscle car wave.  So, to ask which engine you prefer is like asking if you like chocolate or vanilla.
Russ
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 362



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: June 01, 2008, 08:28:53 AM »

well I like vanillla, lol.
Butch0240
Newbie
*
Gender: Male
Posts: 4


My Pony Running Wild!


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 02, 2008, 08:11:17 PM »

What up guy's, new to the forum just wanted to give a shout out to all the MUSTANG lovers! YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Russ
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 362



View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: June 03, 2008, 12:02:18 PM »

What is up Butch, let me be one of the first to tell you welcome. You will find that the guys on here  have forgoten more knowledge about cars than guys on others site can ever learn. Everyone here is on point and would love to see you around here more often. Drop some post and help out with what you know, and even with what you don't lol thanks bro. STANG OUT
Soaring
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 905
Mustang: 1965 coupe, and 2003 Mach1
Daily driver: 1965 Mustang coupe
Location: Wimberley, Texas
Beer?:


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2008, 02:32:34 PM »

If I had a '68 Mach, I think I would be beating the bushes to find a big block like a 428 Cobra Jet.   I can only shoehorn a 351 in my little engine bay though.  Talking about 351's.  The Clevo is a great engine in every respect except for the top end oiling problem, and the difficulty in finding parts.  On the flip side, the 351 Windsor is an easy engine to obtain, parts are readily available, and aftermarket hot rod parts for it are also available.  I guess it just depends on what you want the engine to do, and how much agrivation you are willing to put up with. 
66GTKFB
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 174


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 04, 2008, 04:41:35 PM »

Glen,
If you had a 68 Mach, you would make history.
Jim
Soaring
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 905
Mustang: 1965 coupe, and 2003 Mach1
Daily driver: 1965 Mustang coupe
Location: Wimberley, Texas
Beer?:


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 04, 2008, 05:17:59 PM »

Glen,
If you had a 68 Mach, you would make history.
Jim

Yes, we all know the Mach1 came out as a '69, but there are also purists who preach about the 68 1/2 Mach 1's.  Go figure.  Here is a guy who truly believes he has a 68 MACH1. 
http://www.mustangandfords.com/featuredvehicles/127_0306_68_mach_1/index.html
66GTKFB
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 174


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 04, 2008, 06:30:31 PM »

And I have a 63 Mustang. . .
Soaring
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 905
Mustang: 1965 coupe, and 2003 Mach1
Daily driver: 1965 Mustang coupe
Location: Wimberley, Texas
Beer?:


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 04, 2008, 06:42:15 PM »

A 63 Mustang is not as far fetched as it may seem.  As you are aware, there were prototypes. I doubt you will see them running around on the highways of America, but they did exist.   
66GTKFB
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 174


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 04, 2008, 10:19:51 PM »

Exactly. The 68 Mach was referenced once in that Mustang and Fords article, then the article rambled on about trucks. And yes, there was a 1963 Mustang. It was actually called the Mustang II. It had a 289, the side scoops of a 66 and the grill that was a mix of a 65 and a 71. The original Mustang was a rear engine two seater with IRS. I think Ford went backwards in the design.
Jim
rmodel65
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 285
Mustang: 65 fastback modded
Daily driver: 1991 gt vert
Location: brunstank ga



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: June 05, 2008, 02:13:44 AM »

yeah i saw that car at the 40th annv show in nashville. i had a blast but got there and didnt have any cash to spend thanks to 2 flat tires  :(   but it was cool seeing all the cars driving up from all across ga and tenn, and fla on our trip and driving thru the mountains was a blast. I hope to get my convertible up there one day it was a beautiful site.
Thierry
Thierry
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1142
Mustang: Had a 69 Mustang coupe
Daily driver: Sunfire
Location: Quispamsis NB Canada
Beer?:



View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: June 05, 2008, 12:48:38 PM »

 If you are going this way, there is also a '62 Mustang  :D This is the prototype 1 with the rear engine Jim was talking about.
Soaring
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 905
Mustang: 1965 coupe, and 2003 Mach1
Daily driver: 1965 Mustang coupe
Location: Wimberley, Texas
Beer?:


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: June 05, 2008, 01:44:41 PM »

Yeah, most of us have seen pics of that too.  It was a beautiful design, but not a real practical car for the general population to own.  I had a 1963 Corvair with the rear engine, and I really loved that little car.  It was a Monza, so had the dual carburetors and was a pretty fast little guy. 
Pages: 1
  Print  
 
 

Other languages
ESPANOL
FRANCAIS
Menu
News blog
Mustang classifieds
Muscle car classifieds
Pictures
Classic Mustang FAQ
Parts
Videos
Ford Mustang videos
Vote 4 us
Mustang links


Auto network
Mustangs for sale
Our ads:

More classic Mustangs for sale

Live from Ebay:

Top users
Top posters
1. Soaring
2. Godfather
3. Russ
4. Racedraper
5. Rmodel65

Used Cars for sale - Bad Credit Auto Loans Washington State's bad credit auto financing leader. - Ford Mustang classifieds
Body Kits - Tail Lights - Headlights
SEO Web Directory


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 2.0 Beta 3.1 Public | SMF © 2006–2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!