V8 Ford Mustang forums
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Home
Help
Contact
Login
Register
V8 Ford Mustang forums
»
Forum
»
Technical forums
»
Classic Mustang Technical forum
»
Topic:
289 block and C4 trans question
Print
Pages:
1
Go Down
Author
Topic: 289 block and C4 trans question (Read 3223 times)
65falcon
Newbie
Posts: 4
Gender:
Mustang: 1965 Ford Falcon 4 dr
Daily driver: 1965 Falcon 6cyl
Location: El Cajon, CA
289 block and C4 trans question
«
on:
May 15, 2010, 01:00:48 PM »
i just picked up a 289 block and caps. casting code is
C5AE-6015-E 7A12
The couple different sites that I have looked at have all told me the same thing:
289 HiPo, cast on Jan 12 1967. Would this be correct?
I dont know much about mustangs but were the HiPo engines the ones used in "K-code" cars? and if so, does that mean this block is worth more then the 40 bucks i paid for it? (was also told it was 30 over already)
I plan on bolting it to a C4 trans and droppin it in my falcon. my trans question involves bellhousings. the C4 trans I have now is currently bolted to a 200 I6(both from a 68 falcon). I know im gonna have to get a new bellhousing(6-bolt right?), should i only be looking for bellhousings for that year motor,or are there multiple bellhousings that will fit?
any help will be appreciated. Thanks
Logged
Soaring
Global Moderator
Posts: 4283
Gender:
1965 Mustang coupe 289, '03 Mach1, 03 Lariat
Mustang: 1965 coupe 289, and 2003 Mach1
Daily driver: '03 Ford F-150 Lariat
Location: Wimberley, Texas
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
«
Reply #1 on:
May 15, 2010, 03:47:57 PM »
All 289's shared the same block, so those casting numbers don't tell you if it is a Hipo or not. It's when they put the guts into that block that it became a hipo over the rest of the 289's. Here is some informamtion for you to learn from.
http://www.midcomustang.com/mustanghipo.shtml
As far as the C4, all bellhousings had 6 bolts if built after August of 1964. It had 5 if built before that date.
Logged
66GTKFB
Photo contest winner
Posts: 847
Mustang: 1965 GTFB, 1966 GTFB K, 1966 Hardtop
Daily driver: 1969 VW Baja
Location: Northern California
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
«
Reply #2 on:
May 15, 2010, 04:30:20 PM »
There were four different 6 bolt 289CID blocks, C5AE-6015-E (65-67), C6AE-6015-C (66-67), C8OE-6015-A (67) and C8AE-6015-B (68). All 289CID HP blocks were C5AE-6015-E but not all C5AE-6015-E blocks were HP. That block was the standard block for all of 65 Mustangs and was used into 67. All HP blocks had their VIN stamped in the lower right hand front side just above the oil pan. Your date code, 7A12, indicates a casting date of January 12, 1967 which means a 1967 application. The actual engine assembly date is on an extension to the left of the distributor that has a long bolt from the water pump going into it.
Jim
Logged
Soaring
Global Moderator
Posts: 4283
Gender:
1965 Mustang coupe 289, '03 Mach1, 03 Lariat
Mustang: 1965 coupe 289, and 2003 Mach1
Daily driver: '03 Ford F-150 Lariat
Location: Wimberley, Texas
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
«
Reply #3 on:
May 15, 2010, 05:41:49 PM »
Well, he has a 65 block, not any year thereafter. The way to tell if it is a hipo engine is to tear it down and check the crank, rods, pistons, etc.
Logged
66GTKFB
Photo contest winner
Posts: 847
Mustang: 1965 GTFB, 1966 GTFB K, 1966 Hardtop
Daily driver: 1969 VW Baja
Location: Northern California
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
«
Reply #4 on:
May 15, 2010, 11:15:20 PM »
Read the original post - the C5AE-6015-E block was cast on January 12, 1967.
Read my statement - the C5AE-6015-E block was used from 1965 to 1967.
Read more of my statement - all HP 289 blocks WILL have a VIN number stamped on the block.
Tearing down the engine "just" to see the inside WITHOUT that VIN is a waste of time.
And a 6 cylinder transmission is not strong enough to handle a 289.
Bottom line - get a C4 that came from a V8. That also solves the bellhousing question.
Jim
Logged
Soaring
Global Moderator
Posts: 4283
Gender:
1965 Mustang coupe 289, '03 Mach1, 03 Lariat
Mustang: 1965 coupe 289, and 2003 Mach1
Daily driver: '03 Ford F-150 Lariat
Location: Wimberley, Texas
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
«
Reply #5 on:
May 16, 2010, 01:55:39 AM »
OK, so you are saying if the VIN is stamped into the block then it is a K code? Again, all 289 blocks started out the same in 1965. There is no difference between a K code block and a C code block for 1965. It would be helpful to have the VIN where you say it is stamped.
http://www.hipomustang.com/default2.asp?page=search
Logged
6mustang6
Full Member
Posts: 66
Gender:
Mustang: 1966 Mustang 289
Location: grantville, Ga
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
«
Reply #6 on:
May 17, 2010, 01:22:35 PM »
I thought the only difference in the bottom end was the main caps were alittle stronger basically?
Logged
66GTKFB
Photo contest winner
Posts: 847
Mustang: 1965 GTFB, 1966 GTFB K, 1966 Hardtop
Daily driver: 1969 VW Baja
Location: Northern California
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
«
Reply #7 on:
May 17, 2010, 01:55:26 PM »
The block is the same, no factory alterations. The special components are what makes the difference. Many of these components are counterfitted or altered from other Ford parts. You are correct the the main bearing caps are different, and add to that these block items: crank; rods; pistons; cam; lifters; timing chain; timing gears; and an added counterweight. About the only major component that is used on a HP engine that is used on other 289 4V engines is the intake manifold, the rest are special.
Jim
Logged
Soaring
Global Moderator
Posts: 4283
Gender:
1965 Mustang coupe 289, '03 Mach1, 03 Lariat
Mustang: 1965 coupe 289, and 2003 Mach1
Daily driver: '03 Ford F-150 Lariat
Location: Wimberley, Texas
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
«
Reply #8 on:
May 17, 2010, 02:03:47 PM »
Is there an echo in here?
I'd like to have a "Mexican" block with the added nickel content, then add all the guts of the hipo.
Logged
66GTKFB
Photo contest winner
Posts: 847
Mustang: 1965 GTFB, 1966 GTFB K, 1966 Hardtop
Daily driver: 1969 VW Baja
Location: Northern California
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
«
Reply #9 on:
May 17, 2010, 02:20:56 PM »
Echo (echo - echo). The same quest exists for VW 1600cc engines - Mexican cases, as well as Mexican Ford blocks, stronger blocks/cases because of a different metalurgy.
Jim
Logged
Soaring
Global Moderator
Posts: 4283
Gender:
1965 Mustang coupe 289, '03 Mach1, 03 Lariat
Mustang: 1965 coupe 289, and 2003 Mach1
Daily driver: '03 Ford F-150 Lariat
Location: Wimberley, Texas
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
«
Reply #10 on:
May 17, 2010, 02:35:30 PM »
Yeah, more nickel content= stronger block, but has nothing to do with a K code Mustang engine. I would just like to have a Mexican block with all the K code engine guts.
But, then again, I would have to upgrade the Chassis. Yeller is just too old to make a bastard out of her. She is a proud classic.
Logged
65falcon
Newbie
Posts: 4
Gender:
Mustang: 1965 Ford Falcon 4 dr
Daily driver: 1965 Falcon 6cyl
Location: El Cajon, CA
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
«
Reply #11 on:
May 18, 2010, 10:37:32 PM »
thanks for all the info. so, k-code or not, 289 parts will fit this block. i plan on building a fairly stock short block with 289 crank/rods and some flat top pistons. not sure on the cam cause im not sure on the heads
and as far as the trans goes, i can just get a bell housing from any post -64 trans?
Logged
Soaring
Global Moderator
Posts: 4283
Gender:
1965 Mustang coupe 289, '03 Mach1, 03 Lariat
Mustang: 1965 coupe 289, and 2003 Mach1
Daily driver: '03 Ford F-150 Lariat
Location: Wimberley, Texas
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
«
Reply #12 on:
May 18, 2010, 11:32:53 PM »
As long as it is 6 bolt..
Logged
66GTKFB
Photo contest winner
Posts: 847
Mustang: 1965 GTFB, 1966 GTFB K, 1966 Hardtop
Daily driver: 1969 VW Baja
Location: Northern California
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
«
Reply #13 on:
May 19, 2010, 12:12:02 AM »
A C4 from a 6 cylinder engine will NOT be strong enough for any 289. This is my second reference to this. You need a V-8 type C4.
Jim
Logged
Print
Pages:
1
Go Up
V8 Ford Mustang forums
»
Forum
»
Technical forums
»
Classic Mustang Technical forum
»
Topic:
289 block and C4 trans question
Navigation
Soaring
In memory of our moderator Glen Wren AKA Soaring
1943-2011
Sponsors
Other languages
ESPANOL
FRANCAIS
Menu
LO-FI Version
Mustang classifieds
Muscle car classifieds
Classic Mustang FAQ
Videos
Mustangs for sale
corvette 1987
mustang 1968
corvette 1987
dodge 1956
mustang convertible 1966
mustang pony car 1966
mustang 1966 for sale
mercury 1953
Top Posters
Soaring
Posts: 4283
Thierry
Posts: 1377
66GTKFB
Posts: 847
rmodel65
Posts: 672
Tim175
Posts: 469
Used Cars for sale
-
Ford Mustang classifieds
Powered by
EzPortal