Author Topic: 289 block and C4 trans question  (Read 3223 times)

65falcon

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Gender: Male
  • Mustang: 1965 Ford Falcon 4 dr
  • Daily driver: 1965 Falcon 6cyl
  • Location: El Cajon, CA
289 block and C4 trans question
« on: May 15, 2010, 01:00:48 PM »
i just picked up a 289 block and caps. casting code is C5AE-6015-E 7A12

The couple different sites that I have looked at have all told me the same thing:
289  HiPo, cast on Jan 12 1967. Would this be correct?

I dont know much about mustangs but were the HiPo engines the ones used in "K-code" cars? and if so, does that mean this block is worth more then the 40 bucks i paid for it? (was also told it was 30 over already)

I plan on bolting it to a C4 trans and droppin it in my falcon. my trans question involves bellhousings. the C4 trans I have now is currently bolted to a 200 I6(both from a 68 falcon). I know im gonna have to get a new bellhousing(6-bolt right?), should i only be looking for bellhousings for that year motor,or are there multiple bellhousings that will fit?

any help will be appreciated. Thanks

Soaring

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4283
  • Gender: Male
  • 1965 Mustang coupe 289, '03 Mach1, 03 Lariat
  • Mustang: 1965 coupe 289, and 2003 Mach1
  • Daily driver: '03 Ford F-150 Lariat
  • Location: Wimberley, Texas
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2010, 03:47:57 PM »
All 289's shared the same block, so those casting numbers don't tell you if it is a Hipo or not.  It's when they put the guts into that block that it became a hipo over the rest of the 289's.  Here is some informamtion for you to learn from.
http://www.midcomustang.com/mustanghipo.shtml

As far as the C4, all bellhousings had 6 bolts if built after August of 1964.  It had 5 if built before that date.

66GTKFB

  • Photo contest winner
  • *
  • Posts: 847
  • Mustang: 1965 GTFB, 1966 GTFB K, 1966 Hardtop
  • Daily driver: 1969 VW Baja
  • Location: Northern California
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2010, 04:30:20 PM »
There were four different 6 bolt 289CID blocks, C5AE-6015-E (65-67), C6AE-6015-C (66-67), C8OE-6015-A (67) and C8AE-6015-B (68). All 289CID HP blocks were C5AE-6015-E but not all C5AE-6015-E blocks were HP. That block was the standard block for all of 65 Mustangs and was used into 67. All HP blocks had their VIN stamped in the lower right hand front side just above the oil pan. Your date code, 7A12, indicates a casting date of January 12, 1967 which means a 1967 application. The actual engine assembly date is on an extension to the left of the distributor that has a long bolt from the water pump going into it.
Jim

Soaring

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4283
  • Gender: Male
  • 1965 Mustang coupe 289, '03 Mach1, 03 Lariat
  • Mustang: 1965 coupe 289, and 2003 Mach1
  • Daily driver: '03 Ford F-150 Lariat
  • Location: Wimberley, Texas
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2010, 05:41:49 PM »
Well, he has a 65 block, not any year thereafter.  The way to tell if it is a hipo engine is to tear it down and check the crank, rods, pistons, etc. 

66GTKFB

  • Photo contest winner
  • *
  • Posts: 847
  • Mustang: 1965 GTFB, 1966 GTFB K, 1966 Hardtop
  • Daily driver: 1969 VW Baja
  • Location: Northern California
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
« Reply #4 on: May 15, 2010, 11:15:20 PM »
Read the original post - the C5AE-6015-E block was cast on January 12, 1967.
Read my statement - the C5AE-6015-E block was used from 1965 to 1967.
Read more of my statement - all HP 289 blocks WILL have a VIN number stamped on the block.
Tearing down the engine "just" to see the inside WITHOUT that VIN is a waste of time.
And a 6 cylinder transmission is not strong enough to handle a 289.
Bottom line - get a C4 that came from a V8. That also solves the bellhousing question.
Jim   

Soaring

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4283
  • Gender: Male
  • 1965 Mustang coupe 289, '03 Mach1, 03 Lariat
  • Mustang: 1965 coupe 289, and 2003 Mach1
  • Daily driver: '03 Ford F-150 Lariat
  • Location: Wimberley, Texas
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
« Reply #5 on: May 16, 2010, 01:55:39 AM »
OK, so you are saying if the VIN is stamped into the block then it is a K code? Again, all 289 blocks started out the same in 1965.  There is no difference between a K code block and a C code block for 1965.   It would be helpful to have the VIN where you say it is stamped.   
http://www.hipomustang.com/default2.asp?page=search

6mustang6

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 66
  • Gender: Male
  • Mustang: 1966 Mustang 289
  • Location: grantville, Ga
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
« Reply #6 on: May 17, 2010, 01:22:35 PM »
I thought the only difference in the bottom end was the main caps were alittle stronger basically?

66GTKFB

  • Photo contest winner
  • *
  • Posts: 847
  • Mustang: 1965 GTFB, 1966 GTFB K, 1966 Hardtop
  • Daily driver: 1969 VW Baja
  • Location: Northern California
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
« Reply #7 on: May 17, 2010, 01:55:26 PM »
The block is the same, no factory alterations. The special components are what makes the difference. Many of these components are counterfitted or altered from other Ford parts. You are correct the the main bearing caps are different, and add to that these block items: crank; rods; pistons; cam; lifters; timing chain; timing gears; and an added counterweight. About the only major component that is used on a HP engine that is used on other 289 4V engines is the intake manifold, the rest are special.
Jim

Soaring

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4283
  • Gender: Male
  • 1965 Mustang coupe 289, '03 Mach1, 03 Lariat
  • Mustang: 1965 coupe 289, and 2003 Mach1
  • Daily driver: '03 Ford F-150 Lariat
  • Location: Wimberley, Texas
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
« Reply #8 on: May 17, 2010, 02:03:47 PM »
Is there an echo in here?   ;D I'd like to have a "Mexican" block with the added nickel content, then add all the guts of the hipo. 

66GTKFB

  • Photo contest winner
  • *
  • Posts: 847
  • Mustang: 1965 GTFB, 1966 GTFB K, 1966 Hardtop
  • Daily driver: 1969 VW Baja
  • Location: Northern California
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
« Reply #9 on: May 17, 2010, 02:20:56 PM »
Echo (echo - echo). The same quest exists for VW 1600cc engines - Mexican cases, as well as Mexican Ford blocks, stronger blocks/cases because of a different metalurgy. 
Jim

Soaring

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4283
  • Gender: Male
  • 1965 Mustang coupe 289, '03 Mach1, 03 Lariat
  • Mustang: 1965 coupe 289, and 2003 Mach1
  • Daily driver: '03 Ford F-150 Lariat
  • Location: Wimberley, Texas
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
« Reply #10 on: May 17, 2010, 02:35:30 PM »
Yeah, more nickel content= stronger block, but has nothing to do with a K code Mustang engine.  I would  just like to have a Mexican block with all the K code engine guts. 
But, then again, I would have to upgrade the Chassis.  Yeller is just too old to make a bastard out of her.  She is a proud classic. 

65falcon

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Gender: Male
  • Mustang: 1965 Ford Falcon 4 dr
  • Daily driver: 1965 Falcon 6cyl
  • Location: El Cajon, CA
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
« Reply #11 on: May 18, 2010, 10:37:32 PM »
thanks for all the info. so, k-code or not, 289 parts will fit this block. i plan on building a fairly stock short block with 289 crank/rods and some flat top pistons. not sure on the cam cause im not sure on the heads

and as far as the trans goes, i can just get a bell housing from any post -64 trans?

Soaring

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4283
  • Gender: Male
  • 1965 Mustang coupe 289, '03 Mach1, 03 Lariat
  • Mustang: 1965 coupe 289, and 2003 Mach1
  • Daily driver: '03 Ford F-150 Lariat
  • Location: Wimberley, Texas
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
« Reply #12 on: May 18, 2010, 11:32:53 PM »
As long as it is 6 bolt.. 

66GTKFB

  • Photo contest winner
  • *
  • Posts: 847
  • Mustang: 1965 GTFB, 1966 GTFB K, 1966 Hardtop
  • Daily driver: 1969 VW Baja
  • Location: Northern California
Re: 289 block and C4 trans question
« Reply #13 on: May 19, 2010, 12:12:02 AM »
A C4 from a 6 cylinder engine will NOT be strong enough for any 289. This is my second reference to this. You need a V-8 type C4.
Jim

 

+-Navigation

Soaring
Soaring
In memory of our moderator Glen Wren AKA Soaring
1943-2011
Sponsors

Dallas Mustang




Bangastang

Other languages
ESPANOL
FRANCAIS
Menu
LO-FI Version
Mustang classifieds
Muscle car classifieds
Classic Mustang FAQ
Videos
Ford Mustang videos


Mustangs for sale


corvette 1987
mustang 1968
corvette 1987
dodge 1956
mustang convertible 1966
mustang pony car 1966
mustang 1966 for sale
mercury 1953

Top Posters

Soaring
Posts: 4283
Thierry
Posts: 1377
66GTKFB
Posts: 847
rmodel65
Posts: 672
Tim175
Posts: 469

Used Cars for sale - Ford Mustang classifieds

Powered by EzPortal